Anindya Ghosh Chowdhury Director - Financial Services Consulting
Anindya is a Director at Mazars, and leads its dedicated Prudential Regulation and Risk Management team. He has over 10 years’ experience in Financial Services. Prior to Mazars, he worked at the Bank of England and the PRA, where he held a number of different roles. He was the Lead Auditor for Financial Stability and Prudential Regulation, where he covered the activities of the PRA (Banking and Insurance supervision), Prudential Policy, and Financial Markets Infrastructure directorates. He has also supervised major card payments systems and infrastructure firms that came into the remit of the Bank of England’s supervision. Later, he supervised a major Tier 1 international bank, where he focused on risk management, governance and information sharing.
Prior to joining the Bank of England and the PRA, Anindya qualified as a Chartered Accountant at a Big 4 firm, where he worked with a number of Tier 1 UK and international banks on their enterprise-wide controls and financial accounting. Anindya is an avid cricket fan and is a playing member and treasurer of the Bank of England Cricket Club. He did his schooling in India, before completing an undergraduate degree in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Bath and TU Berlin.
Want to know more?
Pages associated to Anindya Ghosh Chowdhury
Industries
- Regulatory reporting
- Banking – Recovery and Resolution Plans
- Pillar III Disclosures
- IFPR – What UK investment firms need to know
- Safeguarding the quality of risk and regulatory data
- Key upcoming prudential reforms in the financial sector
- The final prudential reforms of 2020
- The FCA is replacing Gabriel with RegData
- A ‘strong and simple’ prudential regime for small banks and building societies in the UK
- UK supervision of international banks post Brexit
- 2021 Stress testing the UK banking system: The Bank of England’s approach
- PRA’s approach to supervision of new and growing banks
- Stress testing the UK banking system: Key changes for 2021
- PRA’s amended filing deadline for annual reports, accounts and regulatory reporting
- PRA’s introduction of simplified obligations for recovery planning
- Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR) – How to prepare
- PRA’s dear CFO letter on ‘disclosures about IFRS 9 ECL accounting’
- IFPR – How to prepare following the release of the first consultation paper
- IFPR – What MiFID firms need to know following the release of the second consultation paper
- IFPR - How to prepare video series
- The FCA proposes enhanced climate-related disclosures by asset managers, life insurers and pension providers
- The PRA emphasises their expectations for reliable regulatory reporting, once again
- Regulated firms: a matter of life and death
- PRA's responses to its consultation on the supervision of international banks
- FS regulatory affairs newsletter - Q4 2021
- A Central Bank Digital Currency in the UK: the exploration continues
- Updated reporting requirements for PRA regulated firms
- Integrity of regulatory reporting remains a key priority of the PRA
- Priorities of the Payment Services Regulator: what PSPs need to consider
- PRA’s strong and simple regime: What might the future hold?
- FS regulatory affairs newsletter - Q1 2022
- Banking - Q1 2022
- Climate and sustainability - Q1 2022
- PRA’s 2022 priorities for banks operating in the UK
- Unpicking the Basel Bufferati
- IFPR – ICARA Process video series
- Initiatives to make the UK a hub for cryptoasset firms
- FS regulatory affairs newsletter - Q2 2022
- Banking - Q2 2022
- Crypto - Q2 2022
- Climate and sustainability - Q2 2022
- FS regulatory affairs newsletter - Q3 2022
- Banking – Q3 2022
- Crypto - Q3 2022
- Recovery and resolution
- FS regulatory affairs newsletter - Q4 2022
- Banking - Q4 2022
- Crypto - Q4 2022
- Strong and Simple regime
- Understanding Basel 3.1
- Review of CP4/23 – The Strong and Simple Framework: Liquidity and Disclosure Requirements
- Financial services regulatory affairs newsletter - Q1 2023
- Banking Q1 - 2023
- Crypto – Q1 2023
- Prudential support
- UK vs EU Basel comparison
- FS regulatory affairs newsletter – Q2 2023
- Banking – Q2 2023
- Crypto – Q2 2023
- Strong and Simple – Does this apply to your firm?
- Strong and Simple - Application to third-country firms
- Implications of PRA’s Basel 3.1 proposals on all firms
- Strong and Simple – Pillar 3 Remuneration Disclosures (review of CP14/23)
- Basel 3.1 – Understand the regulation
- Removal of the SME support factor
- Disclosures and Regulatory reporting
- Market risk
- Operational Risk
- Pillar 2
- Credit Risk - IRB
- Credit Risk – Standardised Approach
- FS regulatory affairs newsletter – Q3 2023
- Banking – Q3 2023
- Digital assets – Q3 2023
- Strong and Simple – Capital insights from international regimes for simpler firms
- Key observations on PRA’s Strong and Simple policy statement (PS15/23)
- Policy statement 17/23 – Basel 3.1 near-final rules part 1
- Digital assets - Q4 2023
- Banking – Q4 2023
- Implementing the IFPR: key lessons for firms from the FCA’s review
- The Strong and Simple regime: operational opportunities and challenges
- UK vs US - Comparing the implementation of Basel 3.1 reforms between the two jurisdictions
- Regulatory reporting assurance for small and medium-sized banks
- What does effective regulatory reporting assurance look like?
- Data implications of Basel 3.1
- Banking – Q1 2024
- Digital Assets - Q1 2024
- The Bank of England shares useful insights to measure climate-related financial risks using scenario analysis
- Our Financial services team