Strong and Simple – Pillar 3 Remuneration Disclosures (review of CP14/23)

Bank of England issued a new consultation paper (CP14/23) that proposes changes to ensure that Pillar 3 remuneration disclosure requirements are more proportional for smaller firms within the Financial Services industry. This will mean smaller banks will report a reduced number of remuneration disclosures. The article will primarily discuss the impact on firms that meet the Strong and Simple criteria [1].

Before the proposed changes by CP14/23, firms populated six templates: REMA and UK REM1 to UK REM5. These templates outlined the remuneration disclosures, including special payments and information for employees with a material impact on the institution’s risk profile and deferred remuneration.

The new changes, as outlined below, are expected to be published in the final policy on remuneration disclosures as part of the Strong and Simple framework in Q4 of 2023. The implementation date for these changes is expected in the second half of 2024.

The changes impact different types of firms depending on nature, size, and complexity. Below, the chart outlines the comparison of existing remuneration disclosure regulations on the different types of firms. These new proposed changes set out in CP14/23 are highlighted in green, whereas Simpler-regime firms are highlighted in white.

Strong and Simple - Pillar 3 Disclosure diagram

Other small firms, which also fall under Basic 3.1 but do not satisfy the small and non-complex institutions (SNCI) or Strong and Simple criteria, can also be included within the remuneration disclosure changes. These firms typically fall just outside the scope of the Strong and Simple bucket resulting from differences in the geography of firm assets, IRB approvals and group asset size. These are listed in more detail within CP5/23.

Disclosures by listed Simpler-regime firms

The PRA proposes the following remuneration templates should be completed by listed Simpler-regime firms:

  • UK REM1 – Remuneration awarded for the financial year.
  • Parts of the UK REMA template, corresponding to paragraphs (a) to (d) of article 450(1) of the disclosure (CRR) part, see below.

Corresponding parts of article 450(1) of the CRR regarding UK REMA:

(a) Information regarding the decision-making process for the remuneration policy, including meeting oversight of the main body overseeing remuneration, compensation, and the mandate of the remuneration body. Additionally, information regarding any external consultancy usage within the remuneration policy creation and the role of any relevant stakeholders should be included.

(b) Information about the link between the pay of staff and their performance.

(c) The most important design characteristics of the remuneration system, including information on the criteria used for performance measurement and risk adjustment, deferral policy and vesting criteria.

(d) The ratios between fixed and variable remuneration set are in accordance with point (g) of Article 94(1) of Directive 2013/36/EU.

This is a significant reduction compared to what was previously required. Therefore, Simpler-regime firms will have cost benefits as fewer resources will be needed to complete the remuneration templates.

Despite only providing a basic overview of the remuneration policy, listed Simpler-regime firms would still deliver transparency to market participants. UK REM1 provides a breakdown of remuneration throughout the firm, helping market participants understand the incentives of the business. UK REMA explains the qualitative nature of the remuneration policy held by firms, outlining governance, risks, and structures.

Disclosures by non-listed Simpler-regime firms

The PRA proposes that non-listed simpler-regime firms are excluded from the requirement to disclose any information about their remuneration policy. Since market participants have limited availability to non-listed firm policies, the PRA found that the costs of disclosures would outweigh the benefits for the firm.

References

[1] Strong and Simple – Does this apply to your firm?